DIR Administrative Rules

VOLUME 1, TEXAS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE

PART X. DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION RESOURCES

CHAPTER 201. PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT OF INFORMATION RESOURCES TECHNOLOGIES.

Contents:

Section 201.1. Definitions.

Section 201.3. Information Resources Managers.

Section 201.5. Agency Planning.

Section 201.7. Interagency Contracts for Information Resources Technologies

Section 201.9. Board Policies.

Section 201.11. Procedure for Adoption of Information Resources Standards and Policies.

Section 201.13. Information Resource Standards.

Section 201.15. Charges for Copies of Public Records.

Section 201.17. Advisory Committees.

Section 201.1. Definitions.

The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

Application - A separately identifiable and interrelated set of information resources technologies that allows a state agency to manipulate information resources to support specifically defined objectives.

Board - The governing board of the Department of Information Resources.

Data processing - Information technology equipment and related services designed for the automated storage, manipulation, and retrieval of data by electronic or mechanical means, or both. The term includes:

(A) central processing units, front-end processing units, miniprocessors, microprocessors, and related peripheral equipment such as data storage devices, document scanners, data entry equipment, terminal controllers, data terminal equipment, computer-based word processing systems other than memory typewriters, and equipment and systems for computer networks;

(B) all related services, including feasibility studies, systems design, software development, and time-sharing services, whether provided by state employees or by others; and

(C) the programs and routines used to employ and control the capabilities of data processing hardware, including operating systems, compilers, assemblers, utilities, library routines, maintenance routines, applications, and computer networking programs.

Department - The Department of Information Resources.

Geographic information system - A computer hardware and software system designed to collect, manage, manipulate, analyze, and display spatially referenced data; includes attribute data (usually in an associated data base), as well as graphic data which may be in vector (line) or raster (image) form; may include cartographic and geographic data such as earth science, natural resource, engineering, demographic, or socioeconomic data; and will include for purposes of these rules all types of automated mapping, facilities management, and mapping applications from a computer-aided design system.

Imaging systems - Information resources technologies with video, scanning, and computer graphics capabilities (including raster formats) which are used to capture, process, create, output, store, and/or archive images, excluding process-control systems for medical diagnostic applications.

Information resources - The procedures, equipment, and software that are designed, built, operated, and maintained to collect, record, process, store, retrieve, display, and transmit information, and associated personnel including consultants and contractors.

Information resources services - Services provided under contract to a state agency by an individual or firm, or by a consultant or professional engineer under Texas Civil Statutes, Articles 664-4 and 6252-11c, which include: studying agency's existing information resources; advising on necessary changes or additions to the information resources environment; performing information resources feasibility studies; information resources training; or recommending, managing, converting, designing, procuring, developing, documenting, programming, testing, implementing, or installing new information resources, including systems development methodologies and disaster recovery capabilities.

Information resources technologies - Data processing and telecommunications hardware, software, services, supplies, personnel, facility resources, maintenance, and training.

Interagency application - An information resources project implemented or used by multiple agencies.

Project - A program to provide information resources technologies support to functions within or among elements of a state agency, which should be characterized by well-defined parameters, specific objectives, common benefits, planned activities, a scheduled completion date, and an established budget with a specified source of funding.

Risk - The possibility of an act or event occurring that would have an adverse effect on the state, an organization or an information system. Risk involves both the probability of failure and the possible consequences of a failure.

Risk Analysis - Risk analysis is the evaluation of planned project events and deliverables in regards to various factors to consider the possibility or probability of failure and the consequences of such a failure. Risk analysis will yield an identification of the areas of greater and lower risk.

State agency - A department, commission, board, office, council, or other agency in the executive or judicial branch of government that is created by the constitution or a statute of this state, including a university system or institution of higher education as defined by the Education Code, Section 61.003.

Statewide application - An information resources project implemented or used throughout state government.

Telecommunications - Any transmission, emission, or reception of signs, signals, writings, images, and sounds of intelligence of any nature by wire, radio, optical, or other electromagnetic systems and includes all facilities and equipment performing those functions that are owned, leased, or used by state agencies and branches of state government.

Telecommunications services - Intercity communications facilities or services. "Telecommunications services" does not include single agency point-to-point radio systems or facilities or services of criminal justice information systems.

Wide area network - A network that interconnects geographical boundaries (such as buildings, campuses, cities, regions, and/or states) which has a total distance (first node to last node) of 2 or more miles and might be connected using common carrier services.

Section 201.3. Information Resources Managers.

(a) Selection of information resources managers.

(1) The head of each state agency is ultimately responsible for the management of state information resources.

(2) The head of a state agency may serve as the agency's information resources manager or may designate another senior agency official to serve as the agency's information resources manager in his behalf. If an institution of higher education has separate computing facilities for academic and administrative computing services, the institution may designate separate information resources managers for academic and administrative information resources. The designation of an agency information resources manager is intended to establish clear accountability for setting policy for information resources management activities, provide for greater coordination of the state agency's information activities, and ensure greater visibility of such activities within and between state agencies.

(3) A member of the board of the department may not also serve as the information resources manager of a state agency.

(4) The head of each state agency shall designate an information resources manager. The state agency's designation must contain the name, title, authority, responsibilities, organizational resources, and education and experience of the proposed information resources manager in the format prescribed by the department. The department must notify the state agency in writing of receipt of the designation of the information resources manager within 30 days after receipt of the designation.

(b) Initial qualifications and continuing education.

(1) Any person who is appointed the information resources manager of a state agency before September 1, 1992 is exempt from the requirements of the department regarding initial education needed for that position.

(2) Any person who is designated by the head of a state agency as the information resources manager of that agency on or after September 1, 1992 must be a senior official of the agency. Agency heads are encouraged, but not required, to make designations on the basis of qualification guidelines provided by the department. After September 1, 1992, information resources managers for agencies should, as a minimum, possess a four-year college or university degree from a fully-accredited institution.

(3) Each designated agency information resources manager shall be required to complete continuing education requirements approved by the board of the department and provided by the department.

(4) The department will provide continuing education programs, including educational materials and seminars, to assure that agency information resources managers remain current in the field of information resources management.

Section 201.5. Agency Planning.

(a) Agency strategic plans.

(1) Submittal procedures.

(A) Each state agency shall prepare and submit to the department an agency strategic plan for information management.

(B) The governing officer or chairman of the governing body of the agency shall sign the plan if the agency is governed by fully paid, full-time state officials. Otherwise, the executive director of the agency shall sign the plan.

(C) Format of the agency strategic plan must comply with instructions, based on paragraph (2) of this subsection, published by the department and distributed to each agency prior to February 1 of each even-numbered year. Content of the plan must include, in the format prescribed by the department:

(i) an executive summary;

(ii) a statement of the agency's mission, goals, and programs;

(iii) a statement of the agency's planning assumptions;

(iv) a description of the present status of the organizational environment, information resources management policies and practices, personnel resources, and operating environment;

(v) a statement of information resources goals and strategies;

(vi) a statement of agency compliance with and support for the state strategic plan for information resources;

(vii) a statement of the agency's long-term information resources needs.

(D) Each agency must submit the agency strategic plan by January 1 of each odd-numbered year.

(2) Contents. Each agency strategic plan must include:

(A) a summary of the agency's goals, objectives, and current programs as found in the agency's legislative appropriations request;

(B) a description of the agency's major data bases and applications;

(C) a description of the agency's current information resources management organizations, policies, and practices;

(D) a description of interagency computer networks in which the agency participates;

(E) a statement of the strategic objectives of the agency relating to information resources management for the next five fiscal years, beginning with the fiscal year in which the plan is submitted, with a description of how those objectives help achieve the agency's programs and goals and support the goals and policies of the state strategic plan;

(F) other planning components as defined in the department's published instructions.

(3) Review procedures.

(A) The department will evaluate agency strategic plans:

(i) for consistency with the state strategic plan, including compliance with standards adopted by publication in the state strategic plan;

(ii) for assurance that agency goals and strategies for information resources are consistent with agency mission, goals, and objectives;

(iii) for the effective use of information resources technologies in support of the agency's mission and its information needs;

(iv) for the technical feasibility of the plan.

(B) The department will review and approve or disapprove each agency strategic plan in writing no later than April 15 of each odd-numbered year. If the department disapproves an agency's plan, it shall notify the agency's information resources manager and executive director in writing of the reasons for disapproval. The agency may appeal the department's disapproval at the next regularly scheduled board meeting.

(b) Biennial operating plans.

(1) Submittal procedures.

(A) Each state agency shall prepare and submit a biennial operating plan to the department once each biennium. The plan is due no later than the 30th day after the date the General Appropriations Act becomes law.

(B) Format of the biennial operating plan must comply with instructions, based on paragraph (2) of this subsection, published by the department and distributed to each state agency.

(C) The governing body of the submitting agency must approve the biennial operating plan, and the information resources manager or the agency head must sign the biennial operating plan.

(D) Extensions on the Biennial Operating Plan deadline may be granted by the department. Within ten days of receiving an agency's request for extension, the department shall inform the agency whether the extension is approved or disapproved.

(E) An agency may request an extension of the deadline for submitting its Biennial Operating Plan. The request should describe the agency's need for additional time, and must be submitted to the department within 15 days after the General Appropriations Act becomes law.

(2) Contents. An agency's biennial operating plan must include:

(A) the amount of money related to information resources actually appropriated to the agency for the biennium beginning September 1; and

(B) Information in the format specified by the department in the operating plan instructions. These instructions are adopted by reference. Copies may be obtained in person or in writing at the Department of Information Resources, P.O. Box 13564, Austin, Texas 78711.

(3) Review procedures.

(A) The department will evaluate biennial operating plans:

(i) for consistency with the General Appropriations Act, other legislation;

(ii) for consistency with the state and agency strategic plans;

(iii) for completeness with respect to published instructions based on paragraph (2) of this subsection;

(iv) for the agency organizational and operational environment;

(v) for needs and benefits;

(vi) for technical validity;

(vii) for cost effective implementation of information resources technologies to meet the agency mission.

(B) The department will review and approve or disapprove each biennial operating plan in writing no later than 45 working days after receipt of the plan. The department may approve all or part of a plan.

(C) The department may not approve an agency's biennial operating plan unless the agency has submitted, and the department has approved, a current agency strategic plan.

(D) If the department disapproves an agency's biennial operating plan, the agency may appeal the decision at the next regularly scheduled board meeting.

(c) Plan amendments.

(1) Submittal procedures.

(A) A state agency shall amend its strategic plan, and/or biennial operating plan when necessary during a biennium. An agency may amend the plans, for example, to implement recommendations resulting from a consulting services contract or staff report that may affect information resources strategies, changes in information resources technologies, or changes in the agency's management of information resources.

(B) A state agency must submit proposed plan amendments to the department for approval.

(2) Review procedures. The department will review and approve or disapprove each proposed plan amendment no later than 30 working days after it is received. Instructions for the format and content of plan amendments and criteria for review of these amendments based on this paragraph for strategic plans, and this paragraph of this subsection for biennial operating plans will be published by the department.

(d) Appeal procedures.

(1) Submittal procedures. A state agency that disagrees with the department's disapproval of a plan, part of a plan, plan amendment, or analysis of project acquisition alternatives may submit a written request to the department for special review no later than 30 days after notification of department disapproval.

(2) Department response.

(A) Upon receipt of a request for appeal, the executive director of the department shall immediately:

(i) inform the agency requesting appeal of the date of the next regularly scheduled board meeting;

(ii) inform the board of the request for appeal; and

(iii) post the appeal on the agenda of the next regularly scheduled board meeting.

(B) The executive director of the department shall provide the following at least three days before the appeal will be heard by the board:

(i) to each board member - a copy of the agency's document to which the appeal pertains, a copy of the department's analysis, a copy of the notice of disapproval, and any other documentation the department considers pertinent or the board member requests;

(ii) to the agency - a copy of the department's analysis.

(C) The board shall decide by majority vote whether to support or overturn the department's disapproval. The state agency may appear and present its position at that meeting. The decision of the board is final.

(e) Implementation of approved plans.

(1) As a consequence of evaluating an agency's biennial operating plan, the department may make approval of the plan, or part of a plan, conditional upon the submission of the following additional information relating to a proposed action to implement the plan:

(A) total estimated costs of the proposed action;

(B) updated statements of need and related performance objectives;

(C) a cost-benefit analysis of the proposed action and alternatives; and

(D) any other factors the department determines necessary.

(2) The department will identify the additional information required under this subsection with reasonable specificity at the time it completes its evaluation of a plan. The condition to the plan approval must be satisfied prior to the agency implementing the affected portions of the plan.

(f) Review of State Agency Analyses of Project Acquisition Alternatives.

(1) Applicability.

(A) Departmental review of analyses of project acquisition alternatives is required for:

(i) state agency information resources projects over the agency threshold as described in an agency's biennial operating plan, or

(ii) any state agency information resources project or other activity as stipulated by the department in its approval of the biennial operating plan; except

(iii) These provisions shall not apply for any agency projects to expand or enhance existing information resources capacity with no significant change in technical environment.

(B) The provisions of this subsection shall only apply to any state agency specified in Article V, Section 96, subsection 6 of the General Appropriations Act.

(2) Waivers.

(A) A waiver shall be granted to any state agency on an emergency basis without first complying with the procedures prescribed by this section for any projects which may become necessary as a result of a natural or human disaster; any order of a court of competent jurisdiction when the ordered period of compliance is less than six months unless the agency has received prior approval for an emergency implementation period in excess of six months; any act of exemption by the Texas Legislature; or other documented emergency conditions. The agency must report and explain to the department any emergency action within 30 days after the action is taken.

(B) A waiver shall automatically apply to any agency whose biennial operating plan projects are classified only as baseline operations, or growth and expansion, or telecommunications and where the agency's total direct costs for all of those projects are less than $750,000.

(C) A waiver shall apply for any agency projects in progress beyond the planning or feasibility study stage on or before May 1, 1992. Such waivers must be requested in writing by the Information Resources Manager. The department will grant or deny waiver requests within 10 working days of receipt of the request, based on evidence of project status.

(3) Compliance; Adoption by Reference. Each analysis of project acquisition alternatives prepared by an agency and submitted to the department must include information in the format specified by the department in the Guide for the Analysis of Project Acquisition Alternatives (hereafter referred to as "Guide"). Information concerning the Guide adopted by reference may be obtained from the Department of Information Resources, P. O. Box 13564, Austin, Texas 78711.

(4) Submittal procedures.

(A) Before project initiation beyond the planning or feasibility stage, each state agency shall prepare and submit to the department an analysis of project acquisition alternatives for projects which meet the applicability requirements stated in paragraph (1) of this subsection and which do not qualify for a waiver under paragraph (2) of this subsection. Agency submissions of information for departmental review shall occur within the timeframes specified in the Guide.

(B) The Information Resources Manager shall sign the transmittal document for the analysis of alternatives.

(5) Review procedures. The department may not approve an agency's analysis unless the agency has submitted, and the department has approved, a current agency strategic and operating plan.

(A) The department will evaluate alternative analyses:

(i) for completeness with respect to published instructions in the Guide. The analysis shall address, but not be limited to, the following factors:

(I) start-up costs associated with the acquisition, including but not limited to the purchase price of the acquisition, site preparation costs, freight charges, and staff costs;

(II) estimated cost of maintenance;

(III) estimated cost of supplies;

(IV) estimated cost of employee training;

(V) estimated cost of additional long-term staff needed;

(VI) estimated increase in employee productivity;

(VII) consistency with agency plans approved by DIR;

(VIII) consistency with statewide standards and policies established in the Statewide Strategic Plan.

(ii) for cost-effectiveness in accordance with published instructions in the Guide or other rule of the department; and

(iii) for any other information the department deems necessary and appropriate.

(B) The department will review and approve or disapprove each analysis of project acquisition alternatives in writing no later than 30 days after receipt of the documents. If the department does not act within the time allowed, the agency may proceed with its project; however, departmental inaction does not exempt the agency, its projects, or its activities from other procedural requirements of the department under this chapter.

(i) First review. If the department disapproves an agency's initial analysis, the agency may perform a recertification of the analysis by an independent reviewer and request a second review as specified in the Guide.

(ii) Second review. If the department disapproves an agency's second analysis, the agency may appeal the decision to the board, under the provisions of subsection (e) of this section, provided the request for appeal is accompanied by the department's disapproval notices and the independent certification of the analysis.

(g) Quality Assurance Review.

(1) Applicability.

(A) Major information resources projects shall be construed as any information resources technology project identified in an agency operating plan whose development cost exceeds $1,000,000 and include one or more of the following:

(i) require a year or more to reach operational status;

(ii) involve more than one state agency or government; or

(iii) materially alters work methods of agency personnel and/or the delivery of services to agency clients.

(B) Appropriation authority provided for major information resources projects as specified in Subparagraph (A) of this paragraph is contingent upon approval of the project by a Quality Assurance Team comprised of the Legislative Budget Office, Department of Information Resources, and Office of the State Auditor.

(2) Waivers.

(A) Emergencies. A waiver from the quality assurance review and independent risk analysis shall be granted to any state agency on an emergency basis without first complying with the procedures prescribed by this section for any projects which may become necessary as a result of a fire, natural disaster or other actual emergency. A report explaining the emergency action must be filed with the Quality Assurance Team not later than the 30th calendar day after the action is taken.

(B) The Quality Assurance Team may at any time waive in whole or in part, the requirement for the independent risk analysis for any project it deems appropriate.

(3) Submittal.

(A) Based on the determination of the level of risk by the Quality Assurance Team, it may require the agency to submit a project development plan. The project development plan shall include a description of management and project controls and shall detail system development milestones.

(B) The Project Development Plan will be signed by the agency's Information Resources Manager and will be submitted to Quality Assurance Team if it is required to be accomplished. Any subsequent changes to the plan by the agency that are material in scope or affect the cost or schedule of the project will be signed by the Information Resources Manager and provided to the Quality Assurance Team.

(C) An independent risk analysis is required unless it has been waived by the Quality Assurance Team. The results of the independent risk analysis must be reviewed by the Quality Assurance Team before appropriation authority is approved for the project.

(4) Quality assurance process.

(A) Using the agency's Biennial Operating Plan, Biennial Operating Plan amendments and any risk assessment information or recommendations, the Quality Assurance Team will determine the project risk level, whether an independent risk analysis is required, the level of monitoring required and if any other action(s) may be necessary. The level of monitoring shall be proportional to the level of risk identified.

(B) Independent Risk Analysis Requirements.

(i) If an independent risk analysis is required, it shall be performed without conflict of interest, prepared by parties independent from the management directly responsible for the development, acquisition, or delivery of information resources projects. Any need for subsequent independent risk analyses will be determined by the Quality Assurance Team.

(ii) The risk analysis must identify potential risks that may occur throughout the project development life cycle.

(iii) The risk analysis shall include, but not be limited to, the following factors:

(I) potential impact on statewide goals, objectives, or operations;

(II) completeness of planning;

(III) appropriateness of the technical solution and/or feasibility;

(IV) consideration of alternatives;

(V) size, costs, and complexity of project;

(VI) use of a standard systems development methodology;

(VII) past performance of the agency; and

(VIII) any other factors the quality assurance team may prescribe.

(C) A post-implementation evaluation report may be required and would be provided to agency executive management and the Quality Assurance Team after the implementation of a major information resources project. The report shall serve as an assessment of the new system in terms of benefits and costs.

(5) Approval Process.

(A) The agency must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Quality Assurance Team that the agency has met project milestones as identified in the approved project development plan prior to the expenditure of funds for major information resources projects in subsequent specified intervals. The agency may be required to submit reports regarding significant project delays and cost overruns.

(B) The Quality Assurance Team will determine the funding status. A letter will be sent notifying the agency of the project risk status, funding amount approved, conditions, stipulations, monitoring level and actions, and the next scheduled review point in time or by event/milestone. An agency may request the opportunity to provide additional information.

(6) Notification of project termination and appeal process.

(A) If the Quality Assurance Team disapproves a project, the following information will be provided to the agency:

(i) notification of pending action;

(ii) reasons for termination of funding; and

(iii) procedures for requesting a reconsideration action.

(B) The agency may request a hearing within 10 work days of the notification of pending action.

(C) After the appeal process is completed, the Quality Assurance Team will notify the agency and the Comptroller of Public Accounts as to expenditure limitations of the project. The Quality Assurance Team will also notify the Legislative Budget Board and the Governor's Office of Budget and Planning regarding the restriction of expenditures and recommended action, if appropriate. The Legislative Budget Board will notify the Comptroller of Public Accounts as to the final disposition of project funds.

Section 201.7. Interagency Contracts for Information Resources Technologies.

(a) Public solicitation required.

(1) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (b) of this section, each state agency that proposes to receive information resources technologies under a contract from another state agency must first solicit bids or proposals for the procurement of such technologies by giving public notice of a request for proposals or a request for bids.

(2) Each state agency that solicits bids or proposals from the public for the procurement of information resources technologies must do so in accordance with applicable rules adopted by the General Services Commission pertaining to competitive bidding or competitive sealed proposals.

(3) If a state agency receives a bid or a proposal from a private vendor in response to a solicitation issued in accordance with this subsection, it must review the bid or proposal and compare it with the best proposed interagency contract that is currently available to the state agency for the receipt of such information resources technologies. Specifically, the state agency must determine whether the bid or proposal:

(A) is for the same or substantially the same technologies as those available under the proposed interagency contract;

(B) would allow the state agency to accomplish the application or project at an acceptable level of quality;

(C) would allow the state agency to accomplish the application or project in an acceptable period of time; and

(D) would have a total cost to the state that is less than the total cost to the state of the best proposed interagency contract that is currently available to the state agency.

(4) If a state agency receives a bid or proposal from a private vendor that satisfies all of the criteria listed under paragraph (3) of this subsection, it may not enter into an interagency contract for the receipt of such information resources technologies.

(b) Exceptions to public solicitation requirement. A state agency may procure information resources technologies from another state agency without first giving public notice of a request for proposals or an invitation for bids in the following cases:

(1) the total dollar amount of the proposed interagency contract does not exceed $50,000;

(2) the state agency has requested and received a waiver from the department in accordance with subsection (c) of this section, and the total dollar amount of the proposed interagency contract does not exceed the amount specified by the department in the waiver; or

(3) the total dollar amount of the proposed interagency contract does not exceed $1,000,000, and one or more of the following circumstances are present:

(A) the primary purpose of the proposed interagency contract is the direct accomplishment of a specific legislative mandate;

(B) the same or substantially the same information resources technologies are available from two or more private vendors under the catalogue purchasing procedure of the General Services Commission at a cost that exceeds the cost of the proposed interagency contract;

(C) the procurement constitutes an emergency purchase under applicable rules of the General Services Commission;

(D) the procurement constitutes a proprietary purchase under applicable rules of the General Services Commission;

(E) both parties to the proposed interagency contract are institutions of higher education with a common governing board, as those terms are defined in the Education Code, Section 61.003; or

(F) both parties to the proposed interagency contract are health and human service agencies, as that term is defined in Texas Civil Statutes, Article 4413(502).

(c) Waivers.

(1) A state agency may submit a written request to the department for a waiver of the public solicitation requirement described in subsection (a) of this section. The written request must include the following:

(A) a description of the proposed interagency contract, including the total dollar amount of the contract;

(B) a description of the circumstances that would, in the opinion of the requesting state agency, justify an exception to the public solicitation requirement;

(C) a certification that a procurement under the proposed interagency contract would, in the opinion of the requesting state agency, be more cost effective than a procurement based on a public solicitation of bids or proposals;

(D) detailed cost information to support the certification of cost effectiveness; and

(E) any other information requested by the department.

(2) Upon receipt of a request for a waiver, the department shall promptly review the request to determine whether it contains the required information and the required certification of cost effectiveness. If the request does contain such information and certification, the department will then review the request to determine whether the proposed interagency contract is consistent with the requesting state agency's current biennial operating plan and all amendments, if any, that have been approved by the department. Unless the proposed interagency contract is clearly inconsistent with the agency's current approved plan and amendments, the department shall issue a written determination that a procurement under the proposed contract is presumed by the department to be more cost effective than a procurement based on a public solicitation of bids or proposals, and shall issue a written waiver of the public solicitation requirement for the proposed contract. The written waiver shall specify the maximum dollar amount that may be expended in connection with the proposed contract without having to comply with the public solicitation requirement.

(3) If the department has not issued a written denial of the waiver request within thirty calendar days following the date of its receipt of the request, the request for a waiver shall be deemed to have been approved for an amount equal to the total dollar amount of the proposed interagency contract.

(4) A decision by the department regarding the issuance of a waiver or a determination of cost effectiveness is final and may not be appealed.

Section 201.9. Board Policies.

The executive director is hereby delegated authority by the board to grant a requesting state agency a compliance waiver from administrative rule, statewide standards, or other board policies. A state agency may request a compliance waiver from administrative rule, statewide standards or other board policy. The agency must clearly demonstrate to the department through written justification any performance or cost advantages to be gained and that the overall economic interests of the state are best served by granting the compliance waiver. The executive director of the department will notify the board when requests for waivers are received.

Section 201.11 Procedure for Adoption of Information Resources Standards and Policies.

(a) Preparation. The department shall prepare proposals for information resources standards and policies as authorized by the Information Resources Management Act. Official information resources standards and policies may be embodied either in administrative rule or the State Strategic Plan for Information Resources Management.

(b) Advisory committees. The department may appoint advisory committees to provide additional expertise to the department in the development or refinement of information resources standards and policies.

(c) Public comments. The department will allow all interested persons reasonable opportunity to submit data, views, or arguments, orally or in writing, concerning the proposed information resources standards and policies, prior to adoption by the Board.

(1) Notice and invitation for comment. The department will give a minimum of 30 days notice and invitation for comment in the Texas Register of its intended action to adopt information resources standards and policies. Written comments received after the end of that period will not be considered by the Board in its deliberations. Written comments concerning proposed actions must be received by the party named in the Texas Register prior to 5:00 p.m. on the expiration day of the notice and comment period. The transmittal envelope must be clearly marked "Formal Comment to Proposed Action Enclosed." Any written comments received after 5:00 p.m. on the final day of the notice and comment period will be returned to sender unopened.

(2) Hearings. An opportunity for separate public hearing on proposed information resources standards and policies will be granted if requested within 10 days after the close of the comment period by at least 25 persons, a governmental subdivision or agency, or by an association having at least 25 members. Multiple requests for public hearings will be consolidated; hearings requested will be announced as open meetings in the Texas Register. Public hearings may be conducted by staff; Board members may elect whether to attend. Public testimony will also be accepted by the department at regularly scheduled Board meetings in accordance with procedures specified by the Texas Open Meetings Act. The Board reserves the right to limit the length of oral presentations in public hearings.

(d) Adoption. The Board will adopt information resources standards and policies by a majority vote. Publication and statewide dissemination by the department will commence upon Board approval.

(e) Amendments. Amendments to the information resources standards and policies may be adopted by the Board at any time, using these procedures, in response to technological advancements, changes in legislation, practical experience, or new issues relating to information resources management.

(f) Continuation of existing standards and policies. Existing information resources standards and policies adopted by Board action prior to the date of final adoption of this rule are deemed to have been subjected to sufficient public comment and will continue in effect until amended without further required action by the department.

Section 201.13 Information Resource Standards

(a) Geographic Information Systems Standards.

(1) Applicability.

(A) All digital spatial data users and developers of new geographic information systems in state agencies and universities must comply with the technical standards specified in the Standards and Guidelines for Geographic Information Systems in the State of Texas.

(B) An institution of higher education, as defined by the Education Code, Section 61.003, will be exempted from these standards when geographic information systems are acquired solely for instructional purposes.

(C) Currently operating systems which are structurally unable to comply are not required to retrofit to these standards.

(2) Waivers.

(A) A waiver shall be granted to any state agency due to any order of a court of competent jurisdiction when the ordered period of compliance is less than 90 days; or any act of exemption by the Texas Legislature.

(B) Letter applications for waivers will be made in writing to the department by the agency information resources manager (IRM). Within 10 days after initial receipt of the waiver request, the department will notify the submitting state agency of all supporting information the department requires to conduct its review. The date of receipt of the waiver application is either the initial date of arrival of the request, or the date that any supporting or other information if requested, is received. Review shall commence on the date of receipt. The department will conduct its review within 30 days after the date of its receipt, evaluate the applications, and grant or deny these waiver requests based on an analysis of the particular circumstances or environment. Consultation with the Geographic Information Systems Standards Committee will be included in the waiver process on an as needed basis, and the committee will review all waivers at their semiannual meetings.

(C) The acquisition of software which cannot support these standards will not be grounds for a waiver.

(3) Adoption by Reference. The Standards and Guidelines for Geographic Information Systems in the State of Texas, herein adopted by reference, may be obtained from the Department of Information Resources, P.O. Box 13564, Austin, Texas 78711.

(4) Submittal procedures. The agency Information Resource Manager (IRM) will certify that Geographic Information Systems development in the agency adheres to the Standards and Guidelines for Geographic Information Systems in the State of Texas.

(5) Review procedures.

(A) The certification will be reviewed by the department and the Geographic Information Systems Standards Committee to determine compliance and agency comprehension of the standards. Review procedures and any subsequent on-site assessment will be consistent with Section 7 of the Standards and Guidelines for Geographic Information Systems in the State of Texas.

(B) The agencies may also request a peer review be performed at any time during the year. Upon receiving such a request, the department will schedule a review as soon as possible.

(b) Information security standards.

(1) Applicability. The following rule constitutes required minimum security standards for the protection of automated information resources for agencies of the state of Texas. The department requests each agency to complete implementation of an information resources security program consistent with these standards on or before September 1, 1997 in accordance with the implementation schedule of subsection (12). Beginning with the agency information resources strategic plan to be submitted on January 1, 1993, agencies shall include in each biennial strategic plan for information resources an overview of their current information security posture and their future plans for completing development of a security program, consistent with these standards and implementation schedule, over each current strategic planning cycle. To assist in the interpretation and implementation of these standards, the department has developed the Information Resources Security and Risk Management Policy, Standards and Guidelines manual which is available on request from the Department of Information Resources, P.O. Box 13564, Austin, Texas 78711.

(2) Classification of information. The state's automated information files and databases are essential and vital public resources which must be protected from unauthorized modification, deletion or disclosure. Subject to executive management review, agency program managers have responsibility for the information assets utilized in carrying out the programs under their direction and accordingly are responsible for classifying program information.

(A) For purposes of this subsection, two classifications of information are defined which require special protective precautions:

(i) confidential information - information maintained by state agencies that is exempt from disclosure under the provisions of the Texas Open Records Act or other state or federal law; and

(ii) sensitive information - information maintained by state agencies that requires special precautions, as determined by agency standards and risk management decisions, to assure its accuracy and integrity by utilizing error checking, verification procedures and/or access control to protect it from unauthorized modification or deletion.

(B) As defined in subparagraph (A)(ii) of this paragraph, sensitive information may be either public or confidential and requires a higher than normal assurance of accuracy and completeness. Likewise, confidential information may also be considered sensitive, requiring special measures to ensure its accuracy. Thus, the controlling factor for confidential information is dissemination, while the controlling factor for sensitive information is that of integrity.

(3) Policy. It is the policy of the State of Texas that:

(A) Automated information and information resources residing in the various agencies of state government are strategic and vital assets belonging to the people of Texas. These assets require a degree of protection commensurate with their value. Measures shall be taken to protect these assets against accidental or unauthorized disclosure, modification, or destruction, as well as to assure the security, reliability, integrity and availability of information.

(B) The protection of assets is a management responsibility.

(C) Access to state information resources must be strictly controlled. State law requires that state owned information resources be used only for official state purposes.

(D) Information which is sensitive or confidential must be protected from unauthorized access or modification. Data which is essential to critical state functions must be protected from loss, contamination, or destruction.

(E) Risks to information resources must be managed. The expense of security safeguards must be appropriate to the value of the assets being protected, considering value to both the state and a potential intruder.

(F) The integrity of data, its source, its destination, and processes applied to it must be assured. Changes to data must be made only in authorized and acceptable ways.

(G) In the event a disaster or catastrophe disables information processing and related telecommunication functions, the ability to continue critical governmental services must be assured. Information resources must be available when needed.

(H) Security needs must be considered and addressed in all phases of development or acquisition of new information processing systems.

(I) Security awareness and training of employees is one of the most effective means of reducing vulnerability to errors and fraud and must be continually emphasized and reinforced at all levels of management. All individuals must be accountable for their actions relating to information resources.

(J) Agency information security programs must be responsive and adaptable to changing vulnerabilities and technologies affecting state information resources.

(K) Agencies must ensure adequate separation of functions for tasks that are susceptible to fraudulent or other unauthorized activity.

(4) Management and staff responsibilities.

(A) The responsibilities of a position with respect to security and risk management shall be commensurate with its authority. Descriptions of security roles and responsibilities for agency personnel shall be included in written position descriptions and compiled in the agency security manual developed and maintained by the information security function.

(B) Each agency head, or the information resources manager acting on delegated authority, shall institute an information security function to administer the agency information security program. It shall be the duty and responsibility of this function to establish all procedures and practices necessary to ensure the security of information assets against unauthorized or accidental modification, destruction, or disclosure. The information security function within each agency shall document and maintain an up-to-date internal information security program. The agency security program shall include written internal policies and procedures for the protection of information resources, be an instrument implementing state information security policies and standards, be applicable to all elements of the agency and be signed by the information resources manager or the agency head.

(C) The Information Resources Management Act makes it clear that information and information resources residing in the various agencies of state government are assets owned by the people of Texas. For the purpose of information resources security and risk management, the concept of owners, custodians and users of information resources, and their surrogate responsibilities to the people of Texas, is utilized in the development of an information security program. The effectiveness of the program depends to a large extent on the correct identification of those surrogate owners, custodians, and users of information. Owners, custodians, and users of data, software, and other information resources shall be identified, documented, and their responsibilities defined. All resources shall be assigned an owner. In cases where data or software is aggregated for purposes of ownership, the aggregation shall be at a level which assures individual accountability. The following distinctions among owner, custodian, and user responsibilities should guide determination of these roles.

(i) Owner responsibilities. The owner of information resources is the designated individual upon whom responsibility rests for carrying out the program that uses the resources. That person is referred to herein as a program manager. The owner, or program manager, is responsible and authorized to: approve access and formally assign custody of the asset; judge the asset's value; specify data control requirements and convey them to users and custodians; and ensure compliance with applicable controls. Ownership responsibilities apply in the development of outsourcing contracts with private firms or with other agencies. These contracts must specify appropriate controls, based on risk assessment, to ensure protection of the state's confidential or sensitive information files, databases and software from unauthorized modification, deletion or disclosure.

(ii) Custodian responsibilities. A custodian is the agent in charge of the organizational unit providing technical facilities, data processing and other support services to owners and users of automated information. The custodian of information resources is assigned the responsibility to: implement the controls specified by the owner; provide physical and procedural safeguards for the information resources within the facility; assist owners in evaluating the cost-effectiveness of controls; administer access to the information resources; and to make provisions for timely detection, reporting, and analysis of unauthorized attempts to gain access to information resources. Custodial responsibilities apply to all entities providing outsourcing services to state agencies.

(iii) User responsibilities. The users of information resources have the responsibility to: use the resource only for the purposes specified by its owner; comply with controls established by the owner; and prevent disclosure of confidential or sensitive information.

(D) The agency information security function acting on behalf of the agency head and with cooperation from program and technical management, shall assign information asset ownership and ownership responsibilities for all information resources within the agency.

(E) Program managers, having been assigned information resource ownership, shall assign custody of program assets to appropriate technical and data center managers and ensure they are provided the appropriate direction to implement the security controls and procedures that have been defined.

(F) Technical managers, assigned information resource custodianship, are charged with executing the monitoring techniques and procedures for detecting, reporting and investigating breaches in information asset security.

(G) An internal audit of the information security function shall be performed periodically, based on risk assessment, as directed by the agency head or the information resources manager acting on delegated authority for risk management decisions.

(5) Risk analysis.

(A) The information security function within each agency shall require a comprehensive risk analysis of all information processing systems be performed on a periodic basis as set by agency standards. Risk analysis results shall be presented to the owner of the information resource for risk management. Each step of the risk analysis process must be documented. The degree of risk acceptance (i.e., the exposure remaining after implementation of the recommended protective measures) must be identified.

(B) A risk analysis report documenting the risk assessment must be submitted to the agency head. The risk analysis process provides the basis for preparing the agency's risk analysis report.

(C) All information resources determined by agency management to be essential to the agency's critical mission and functions, the loss of which would have an unacceptable impact, shall have a written and cost effective contingency plan that will provide for the prompt and effective continuation of critical state missions in the event of a disaster. The contingency plan shall be tested and updated at least annually to assure that it is valid and remains current.

(D) Data and software essential to the continued operation of critical agency functions shall be backed up. The security controls over the backup resources shall be as stringent as the protection required of the primary resources.

(6) Personnel Practices.

(A) Each agency shall prepare a security manual that lists the agency's security policies and procedures. All agency personnel shall be required to provide written acknowledgment that they have received, read and understand the security policies and procedures. The agency head, or the information resources manager acting on delegated authority, shall determine how often this written acknowledgment must be renewed.

(B) Each agency shall establish procedures for reviewing information resource functions to determine which positions require special trust or responsibilities.

(C) Agencies shall use non-disclosure agreements to document the acceptance by employees and contractors of special information security requirements as defined by agency standards and risk management decisions.

(D) Agencies shall provide an ongoing awareness and training program in information security and in the protection of state information resources for all personnel whose duties bring them into contact with confidential or sensitive state information resources. Security training sessions for these personnel shall be held at least annually. Further, awareness and training in security shall not be limited to formal training sessions, but shall include periodic briefings and continual reinforcement of the value of security consciousness in all employees whose duties bring them into contact with confidential or sensitive state information resources.

(E) State agencies shall take advantage of new employee orientation to establish security awareness and inform new employees and contractors of information security policies and procedures. If an employee leaves the employment of any agency of the state, for whatever reason, all security privileges shall be immediately revoked and the employee shall be prevented from having any opportunity to access information.

(7) Physical security.

(A) Management reviews of physical security measures shall be conducted annually, as well as whenever facilities or security procedures are significantly modified.

(B) Physical access to central computer rooms shall be restricted to only authorized personnel. Authorized visitors shall be recorded and supervised.

(C) Employees and information resources shall be protected from environmental hazards. Designated employees shall be trained to monitor environmental control procedures and equipment and shall be trained in desired response in case of emergencies or equipment problems.

(D) Confidential or sensitive information, when handled or processed by terminals, communication switches, and network components outside the central computer room, shall receive the level of protection necessary to ensure its integrity and confidentiality. The required protection may be achieved by physical or logical controls, or a mix thereof.

(E) Emergency procedures shall be developed and regularly tested.

(8) Information security.

(A) Authorized use and ownership.

(i) All information and telecommunication resources leased or owned by the state and all time-sharing services billed to the state shall be used only to conduct state business.

(ii) All computer software programs, applications, source code, object code, and documentation shall be deemed to be a work made for hire and is state property and shall be protected as such if developed:

(I) by state employees in the course and scope of their employment or with the use of state equipment, materials, or other resources, with the exception of employees of universities and other institutions of higher education, provided such university or institution has an intellectual property policy in place which addresses ownership rights regarding software development; or

(II) by contract personnel acting under a contract with the state, unless the contract under which the software or documentation is developed specifically provides otherwise; or

(III) with state funds.

(iii) All computer software programs, applications, and documentation purchased for the use of the state is state property and shall be protected as such.

(B) Confidentiality of data and systems.

(i) Confidential information shall be accessible only to personnel who are authorized by the owner on a strict "need to know" basis in the performance of their duties. Data containing any confidential information shall be readily identifiable and treated as such in its entirety.

(ii) When confidential or sensitive information from one agency is received by another agency in connection with the transaction of official business, the receiving agency shall maintain the confidentiality or sensitivity of the information in accordance with the conditions imposed by the providing agency.

(C) Integrity. Controls shall be established to ensure the accuracy and completeness of data. User management shall ensure that data comes from the appropriate source for the intended use.

(D) Passwords.

(i) Except for public users of systems where such access is authorized, or for situations where risk analysis demonstrates no need for individual accountability of users, each user of a multiple-user automated system shall be assigned a unique personal identifier or user identification. User identification shall be authenticated before the system may grant that user access to automated information.

(ii) A user's access authorization shall be removed from the system when the user's employment is terminated or the user transfers to a position where access to the system is no longer required.

(iii) Systems which use passwords shall conform to the federal standard on password usage contained in the Federal Information Processing Standard Publication 112 (FIPS PUB 112), which specifies minimum criteria and provides guidance for selecting additional password security criteria, when appropriate. A current password standard compliance document shall be maintained for each system which uses passwords, specifying the criteria to be met for the ten factors which address design, implementation, and use of access control systems as contained in the FIPS PUB 112 standard.

(E) Auditability.

(i) Audit trails shall be maintained to provide accountability for all accesses to confidential or sensitive information and software and for all changes to automated security or access rules.

(ii) An auditable, continuous chain of custody shall record the transfer of confidential or sensitive information.

(iii) A sufficiently complete history of transactions shall be maintained for each session involving access to confidential or sensitive information to permit an audit of the system by tracing the activities of individuals through the system.

(iv) Automated systems which process confidential or sensitive information must provide the means whereby authorized personnel have the ability to audit and establish individual accountability for any action that can potentially cause access to, generation of, or effect the release of the information.

(F) Access controls. Controls shall ensure that legitimate users of the computer cannot access stored software or data unless they have been authorized to do so.

(G) Security breaches.

(i) Security breaches shall be promptly investigated.

(ii) If criminal action is suspected, the agency must contact the appropriate local law enforcement and investigative authorities immediately. Laws governing the admissibility of evidence are very strict, and without professional advice the agency may be jeopardizing possible legal actions.

(H) Systems development and testing.

(i) Test functions shall be kept either physically or logically separate from production functions. Copies of production data shall not be used for testing unless the data has been declassified or unless all personnel involved in testing are otherwise authorized access to the data.

(ii) Appropriate information security and audit controls shall be incorporated into new systems. Each phase of systems acquisition shall incorporate corresponding development or assurances of security and auditability controls.

(iii) After a new system has been placed in operation, all program changes shall be approved before implementation to determine whether they have been authorized, tested, and documented.

(9) Authentication, data encryption, and key management.

(A) Systems shall implement authentication functions that are consistent with the level of confidentiality or sensitivity of the data they contain and process.

(B) It will not be a requirement at this time for agencies to use data encryption techniques for storage and transmission of data. However, those agencies who choose to employ data encryption shall adopt the data encryption standard, also referred to as the DES algorithm, which is defined in the Federal Information Processing Standard Publication 46-1 (FIPS PUB 46-1). It is highly recommended that electronic fund transfer (EFT) systems use the data encryption standard (DES). For systems employing encryption as described above, procedures shall be prescribed for secure handling, distribution, storage, and construction of DES key variables used for encryption and decryption. Protection of the key shall be at least as stringent as the protection required for the information encrypted with the key.

(10) Data communication systems.

(A) General network controls.

(i) Network resources participating in the access of confidential information shall assume the confidentiality level of that information for the duration of the session. Controls shall be implemented commensurate with the highest risk.

(ii) All network components under state control must be identifiable and restricted to their intended use.

(B) Distributed network access security. Owners of distributed information resources served by distributed networks shall prescribe sufficient controls to ensure that access to those resources is restricted to authorized users and uses only. These controls shall selectively limit services based on:

(i) user identification and authentication (e.g., password, smart card/token), or

(ii) designation of other users, including the public where authorized, as a class (e.g., public access through dial-up or public switched networks), for the duration of a session; or

(iii) physical access controls.

(C) Application security. Network access to an application containing confidential or sensitive data, and data sharing between applications, shall be as authorized by the application owners and shall require authentication.

(D) Alternate procedures. If the agency utilizes a communication network to process critical applications or functions, it shall, as part of its contingency plan, provide for an alternate means of accomplishing its program objectives in case the system or its communication network becomes unavailable. Alternative procedures shall be established that enable agency personnel to continue critical day-to-day governmental operations in spite of the loss of the communication network.

(E) Dial-up access. For services other than those authorized for the public, users of dial-up terminals shall be positively and uniquely identifiable and their identity authenticated (e.g., by password) to the systems being accessed.

(F) Warning statements. System identification screens shall include the following warning statements:

(i) unauthorized use is prohibited;

(ii) usage may be subject to security testing and monitoring; and

(iii) abuse is subject to criminal prosecution.

(11) Personal computers and word processors. Personal computer systems and word processors used to store, process and/or access confidential or sensitive data, shall undergo risk analysis as required by the information security function. Risk analysis results shall be presented to the owner of the information resources for risk management. The degree of risk acceptance (i.e., the exposure remaining after implementation of the recommended protective measures) must be identified. The information security function must be prepared to demonstrate that security precautions have been established to ensure data confidentiality and the maintenance of information integrity.

(12) Implementation schedule. Implementation of this rule shall be in accordance with the following schedule. Earlier implementation of any item would be advantageous to the protection of state information resources.

(A) September 1, 1993 - Establish an information security function (reference paragraph (4) of this subsection) to administer the agency information security program which shall include:

(i) written internal policies and procedures for the protection of information resources;

(ii) assignment of information asset ownership and custodianship and the attendant responsibilities for all information resources within the agency.

(B) September 1, 1993 - Implementation of all required personnel practices (reference paragraph (6) of this subsection).

(C) September 1, 1994 - Completion of risk analysis (reference paragraph (5) of this subsection) of all information resources (including mainframes, minicomputers, personal computers, local area networks and distributed processing systems) used to collect, record, process, store, retrieve, display and transmit confidential or sensitive information, including:

(i) documentation of risk analysis results;

(ii) recommended protective measures;

(iii) the degree of risk acceptance after such measures would be implemented;

(iv) a written disaster recovery plan.

(D) September 1, 1994 - Implementation of all physical security requirements (reference paragraph (7) of this subsection):

(i) physical access controls;

(ii) identification of environmental hazards;

(iii) development of environmental control procedures;

(iv) emergency response training.

(E) September 1, 1995 - Implementation and testing of agency disaster recovery plans (reference paragraph (5)(C) of this subsection).

(F) September 1, 1996 - Implementation of information resources protective measures as identified by risk analysis including those for mainframes, minicomputers, personal computers, local area networks and distributed processing systems (reference paragraph (8) of this subsection):

(i) logical and/or physical access controls to all information resources on a "need to know" basis;

(ii) user authentication (passwords);

(iii) data integrity controls;

(iv) audit trails;

(v) periodic internal audits;

(vi) documentation and investigation of security breaches.

(G) September 1, 1997 - All remaining requirements consistent with these standards.

(H) Waivers. The executive director of the department is hereby delegated authority by the board to grant a requesting state agency a compliance waiver from any implementation date of the schedule in this paragraph. Application for waiver will be made in writing to the department by the agency information resources manager. The agency must clearly demonstrate to the department through written justification that the overall economic interests of the state in matters of information security are best served by granting the compliance waiver and the requesting agency must submit a new written implementation schedule. The department will act on requests for waivers based on the agency's compliance with other information security standards not affected by the waiver, the agency's newly submitted implementation schedule, and the provision that the executive director of the department will notify the board when requests for waivers are received.

(c). Use of TEXAN Network.

(1) Applicability.

(A) All state agencies are to use the Texas Agency Network (TEX-AN) to the fullest extent possible.

(B) Funds appropriated to state agencies as defined in Texas Civil Statutes, Article 601b, Section 1.02(2), shall not be expended for the acquisition of intercity telecommunications facilities or services until a determination has been made by the Telecommunications Services Division of the General Services Commission and the Department (DIR) that the agency requirement for intercity telecommunications cannot be met by the TEX-AN network.

(C) State agencies shall not enter into or renew contracts with carriers or other providers of intercity telecommunication facilities or services without obtaining waivers from the Telecommunications Services Division and the DIR certifying that the requested intercity telecommunications requirements cannot be provided at reasonable costs on TEX-AN network.

(2) Waivers.

(A) A waiver shall be granted to any state agency upon receipt of a written request and determination of the Telecommunications Services Division of the General Services Commission and the DIR that the action is most cost effective to the entire State of Texas.

(B) Waivers will be granted for periods not to exceed one fiscal year from the effective date of the waiver.

(C) Waivers will automatically expire upon the expiration date unless an extension is approved by the Telecommunications Services Division and the DIR.

(D) Contracts for services obtained under waiver shall not extend beyond the expiration date of the waiver.

(3) Review Procedures.

(A) The department and the Telecommunications Services Division of the General Services Commission will evaluate waiver requests for consistency with the General Appropriations Act, other legislation, and the priorities as described in the State Strategic Plan for Information Resources Management, and for cost-effectiveness to the entire State of Texas.

(B) The department will grant or deny waiver requests in writing no later than 30 working days after receipt of the request.

(d). Standard for Data Transport Networks for Computers.

(1) Definitions.

(A) For purposes of this section the word "network" will refer to all data transport networks used primarily to interconnect computers and networks of computers for the purpose of transporting data, allowing interoperation of computer applications on more than one computer system, and providing access to data.

(B) For purposes of this section the phrase "substantial change" is defined to mean any change, reorganization, modification or reimplementation that involves procurement of new or upgraded network hardware or software for more than 50% of the affected computer systems.

(C) For purposes of this section "non-adjacent buildings" are defined as those that are physically separated by property not owned by the State and where there is no State owned right-of-way connecting the buildings.

(2) Standard. All networks that span more than one non-adjacent building, or interconnect more than one agency must adhere to the following:

(A) If the network is in existence at the time this rule is adopted, the network must become compliant with (B) below by August 31, 2001.

(B) All new networks, all extensions to existing networks and all networks undergoing substantial change:

(i) must adhere to the TCP/IP standards as listed in RFC 1500 or its most recent successor document; or

(ii) when products registered by the National Institutes of Standards and Technology as adhering to the Federal GOSIP standards, version 2, as specified in FIPS Publication 146-1, are more cost effective, such products may be specified.

Section 201.15. Charges for Copies of Public Records.

(a) Definitions. The following words and terms, when used in this section, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

(1) Full cost - The sum of all direct costs plus a proportional share of overhead, or indirect costs. Full cost should be determined in accordance with generally accepted methodologies.

(2) Nonstandard-size copy - A copy of public information that is made available to a requestor in any format other than a standard-size paper copy. Microfiche, microfilm, diskettes, magnetic tapes, CD-ROM, and nonstandard-size paper copies are examples of nonstandard-size copies.

(3) Readily available information - Information that already exists in printed form, or information that is stored electronically and is ready to be printed or copied without requiring any programming, or information that already exists on microfiche or microfilm. Information that requires a substantial amount of time to locate or prepare for release is not readily available information.

(4) Standard-size copy - A printed impression on one side of a piece of paper that measures up to 8 by 14 inches. Each side of a piece of paper on which an impression is made is counted as a single-copy. A piece of paper that is printed on both sides is counted as two copies.

(b) The following is a summary of the charges for copies of public information on file in the Department of Information Resources.

(1) Standard-size paper copy $.10 per page

(2) Nonstandard-size copy

(A) Diskette $1.00 each

(B) Computer magnetic tape $10.00 each

(C) VHS video cassette $2.50 each

(D) Audio cassette $1.00 each

(E) Paper copy $.50 each

(F) Other Actual cost

(3) Personnel charge $15.00 per hour

(4) Overhead charge 20% of personnel charge

(5) Microfiche or microfilm charge

(A) Paper copy $.10

(B) Fiche or film copy Actual cost

(6) Remote document retrieval charge Actual cost

(7) Computer resource charge

(A) Mainframe $17.50 per minute

(B) Midsize $3.38 per minute

(C) Client/Server $1.00 per minute

(D) PC or LAN $.50 per minute

(8) Programming time charge $26.00 per hour

(9) Miscellaneous supplies Actual cost

(10) Postage and shipping charge Actual cost

(11) Fax charge

(A) local $.10 per page

(B) long distance, same area code $.50 per page

(C) long distance, different area code $1.00 per page

(12) Other costs Actual cost

(c) The Department of Information Resources shall furnish public records without charge or at a reduced charge if it is determined that waiver or reduction of the fees is in the public interest.

Section 201.17. Advisory Committees.

(a) State Strategic Plan for Information Resources Management Advisory Committee.

(1) This advisory committee shall consist of at least 9 and not more than 24 members appointed by the Department Executive Director with the approval of the Board. Members should have demonstrated the ability to think strategically and to work in a consensus building, committee setting. The membership will include at least:

(A) two information resources managers from Texas State agencies other than a university system or institution of higher education as defined in Education Code, Section 61.003;

(B) one representative from a State university system or institution of higher education as defined in Education Code, Section 61.003;

(C) one resident of the State that is not currently employed by the State and is not employed in the computing and/or telecommunications field;

(D) one representative from a local government organization in the State that is knowledgeable about computing and/or telecommunications;

(E) two representatives from the computing and/or telecommunications industry but whose company does not sell computing or telecommunications services or products to the State;

(F) one representative from an organization that sells computing and/or telecommunications services or products to the State;

(G) one representative from a Federal agency that is knowledgeable about computing and/or telecommunications.

(2) This advisory committee shall be appointed after November 30 of every odd numbered year for a term to expire on November 30 of the following odd numbered year.

(3) This advisory committee shall:

(A) review and advise on the development of the State Strategic Plan for Information Resources Management as it is prepared for publication pursuant to the Information Resources Management Act, Tex. Gov't Code Ann., Chapter 2054;

(B) meet at least once during its term;

(C) develop a strategic vision of what the future of computing and telecommunications technology is for State government as a whole.

(4) The department may elect to provide professional facilitation for any meetings the Advisory Committee may hold.

(5) The department may elect to have department staff present at Advisory Committee meetings.

(6) The department will set the agenda of all Advisory Committee meetings.

(7) The department may reimburse committee members for travel expenses related to attending committee meetings.

View contact information for each of our offices. This is where you will find a list of our agents also. Info

A number of snack vending machines are electrically operated. There are snack vending machines that are see-through or have fronts which are glass-made. Various snack vending machines can only dispense as little as six or ten types of snacks or it can sell a wide range of snack and beverage choices.